(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.01 2013가단215124

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.01 2013가단215124

청구이의

Text

1. The defendant's executive force against the plaintiff is the Seoul Central District Court 2012Kao-5846 costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Facts of premise;

A. (i) The Defendant filed an application for confirmation of the amount of litigation costs with respect to the previous lawsuit between the original Defendant under this Court Decision 2012Kao-5846, and this Court rendered a decision on January 29, 2013 that the amount of litigation costs that the Plaintiff is to pay to the Defendant was KRW 5,210,570 (hereinafter “instant decision”).

D. On June 19, 2013, the Supreme Court rendered a final decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s reappeal (hereinafter “decision to dismiss the reappeal”) against the instant decision, and the said decision to dismiss the reappeal reached the Plaintiff on June 24, 2013.

B. (i) The Plaintiff attempted to communicate with the Defendant for the repayment of the costs of lawsuit, but did not contact with the Defendant, and visited the Defendant’s domicile in the instant decision by withdrawing money on June 27, 2013 and visited the Defendant’s domicile in the instant decision, however, the Defendant had already been appointed two years prior to the filing of the reimbursement.

The plaintiff visited the defendant's resident center in the jurisdiction over the defendant's domicile under the above decision and received a certified copy of the defendant's resident registration, but the resident center refused to issue.

Secondly, on June 28, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for deposit for repayment with the District Court for the reason that the Defendant refused to receive payment, and was entitled to obtain the original copy of the Defendant’s resident registration, but the Defendant’s address was C and C, 516 Dong 701.

Applicant The above court accepted the repayment deposit of KRW 5,210,570, the full amount of the costs of the lawsuit according to the instant decision, as the deposit amount, the Defendant, and the Defendant, and the fact that the cause of the deposit was not received by the deposited person (hereinafter “the instant repayment deposit”) in 2013 gold 2053 on the same day.

C. (1) On July 29, 2013, the Defendant applied for a compulsory auction of real estate as D with respect to the real estate owned by the Plaintiff on July 29, 2013.

Sheet this Court on August 1, 2013

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.24 2014나26025

-부산지방법원동부지원 2019.10.15 2018가단10397

-춘천지방법원영월지원 2019.10.16 2018가단12105

-창원지방법원진주지원 2017.05.25 2016가단9670

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.04.18 2017가단15423