logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고단3665
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Incheon District Court on July 17, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 13, 2014 at the Net Prison on July 13, 2014.

[Defendant A] From March 24, 2015, the Defendant 19:0 on March 24, 2015, up to 19:00, around the south-gu, Incheon, and around 214, took a disposable injection device containing approximately 0.05g of Mepta (one philopon; hereinafter referred to as “philopon”).

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he received philophones, which are a local mental medicine.

"2015 Highest 7528"

1. On April 2015, Defendant A, at around 23:30, the date, 2015, sent 1.4g gramopon to B free of charge a single-use injection machine and a 1.4g gramopon, in which the non-fluoric quantity of the mematicly mpics (i.e., one phiopon (i., one phiopon; hereinafter referred to as “phiopon”) was mixed with water at the mopon toilet located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu G.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he received philophones, which are a local mental medicine.

2. Defendant B, at the date and time as described in paragraph (1), and at the place specified in paragraph (2), 1 for a single-use divers, where the non-opopopopopopopopic volume was mixed with water, and 1.4g for a single-use divers, where the non-opopopic volume was dilutiond with water, were injected into the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he received and administered philophones, which are a local mental medicine.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements [Defendant A] 2015 High Order 3665];

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect with respect to F; and

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Inquiry into criminal history records, investigation reports (the confirmation report on the date of release from office), personal identification and confinement status "2015 highest order 7528";

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A written appraisal of narcotics (2);

1. Previouss before ruling: A/Written inquiry, such as criminal history;

arrow