Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, as to the defendants, the above two-year period from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 2, 2016, from around 22:20 to 22:30 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by driving alcohol at the “F” drinking house of the victim’s “F” in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, so that the victim’s trokes on the bat, which had been on the bat, scam, etc., was broken. The Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by having the customers in the bating the disturbance, such as bating the victim’s bat, and skeing the bat.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report on the date and time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph (a) and having been dispatched from H to the patrol officer belonging to the Daejeon Daejeon Police Station G District, and in doing so, to the above H, “h is a parent-type system;

In the event of parents, they committed assault, such as "no matter so as to be available", and tamping H with the hand floor once, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties concerning handling civil petition reports.

2. Defendant B: (a) assaulted the police officer, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) on the same grounds as, and on the same grounds as, the date and place; (b) assaulted that the police officer attempted to arrest A as a suspect of interference with the performance of official duties; and (c) received her hair from the left side of the said H on one occasion; and (d) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to I, H, and E;

1. Investigation report (to be accompanied by statements from the other party to the witness and photographs of cell phone images);

1. Application of field photographs and CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties) and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of duties) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B who choose to imprisonment with prison labor: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the grounds for sentencing) (the favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) is against all the confessions of crimes.