beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 헌재 2004. 7. 6. 선고 2004헌마481 결정문 [형법 제63조 등 위헌확인 (제37조 제28조 제1항,제39조 제1항 )]
[결정문] [지정재판부]
Cases
Article 63 of the Criminal Act, Article 63 of the 2004HunMa481, etc.
Claimant
Man Maumb
Text
The appeal of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
According to the records, the claimant did not appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent and did not correct the correction within the correction period even after the applicant was ordered to appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent. Thus, the claimant's decision to dismiss it in accordance with Articles 25 (3) and 72 (3) 3 of the Constitutional Court Act.
July 6, 2004
Judges
Competence of the presiding judge
Justices Song Jin-in-Law
Senior Justice;