logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.12.15 2015고합304
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On May 7, 2015, the Defendant, as a C bus engineer, was driving a bus on May 18:15, 2015, and proceeded ahead of the wind station distance in the Pungdong-dong-dong, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, with the emult-si flood control at the low-dong high school level.

Since the front door of the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive the front door in accordance with the direction of signal lights, etc., but the defendant neglected this duty and neglected to do so, and neglected to enter the intersection in an unreasonable manner, and neglected to make a yellow signal prior to the entry into the intersection, and caused the part of the victim D(26 years old) driving in front of the left-hand part of the victim D(26 years old) driving in the right-hand side of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained bodily injury, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time, destroyed damaged vehicles by causing damage to KRW 1,732,916 of repair cost, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims.

2. Determination

A. In light of the purport of the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant and his defense counsel could not have suffered injuries due to the instant accident, it cannot be said that there was a need to take measures under Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding the Defendant, etc.

In addition, after the occurrence of the accident, the defendant was temporarily stopped at the center of the road, and was aware that the flow of the vehicle following the division between the victim and the victim was hindered. Since bus passengers were in the situation of demanding continuous operation, it was thought that bus passengers would be able to deal with the accident after the accident, and stopped at a nearby bus stop in the area where the accident occurred, and the victim would not have been able to leave the scene.

arrow