A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2014, at around 18:35, the Defendant assaulted the 1112-report that he was assaulted by E at the D main station located in the Sinjin-si, and that he prevented the Defendant who was sent to the scene by the slope G affiliated with the Fa of the Sinjin Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene, from assaulting the said G’s chest at one time, and that he was able to control the Defendant who attempted to assault E again.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-1-4 months), [decision of sentence] The fact that the police officer, who received a report and dispatched while assaulting E, uses the police officer to restrain it, and the nature of the crime is disadvantageous to the defendant. There is no criminal record that the defendant was sentenced to punishment or a punishment exceeding fine for the crime related to violence, and that the defendant's health is not good for the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, the sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case.