(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.02 2016고단4380

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.02 2016고단4380

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

The Defendant, in collusion with D (Action on February 17, 201, and imprisonment with labor on May 19, 201), E, and F, in collusion, the Defendant opened a “H” game room in the name of D (hereinafter “H” in this case) in E-si, E-si, E-si, the actual business owner of the game room, and takes charge of the installation and profit-making management of the game room. D, as the president of the business, takes charge of the overall business of the game room, and E, in exchange for money, exchanged premiums acquired from the game room for customers outside the game room, and F is an employee in charge of providing entertainment and exchange brokerage in cash.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, in collusion with D, E, and F, the defendant from March 11, 2009 to the same year.

5. From October, 200 to 40 computers, the said H Games were installed with the “ditable block” game products (from March 11, 2009 to April 24, 2009) and “Japanese Farm” game products (from April 25, 2009 to May 10, 2009), and the game products were installed with the head of the game and made use of the said game by allowing customers who found the head of the game to use the said game, and with the gift acquired by the customers (protruding, hick) exchanged with the book volume, and exchanged them with 4,500 won from customers outside the game site.

Judgment

1. Summary of the defendant's defense counsel's assertion

A. The Defendant, in collusion with D, E, and F, did not operate the game of this case in collusion with the Defendant merely received the transfer proceeds from the importation received by operating the game of this case under the name of Seosan Team or I after transferring the game of this case to I. The Defendant transferred the game of this case to I.

B. Around April 12, 2009, around 12, 2009, the game business of this case was terminated by the I, as it had a farm game machine, and thereafter, D acquired the game of this case from the Defendant, and newly started business from June 6, 2009.

. An accomplice;

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2017.06.08 2017고단499

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.01.29 2015고단2383

-부산지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고단1263

-부산지방법원 2016.07.20 2015고단7674

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.18 2018고단3658