1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Crane car.

On May 17, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.093% on blood alcohol level on May 17, 2013, and operated the said car at approximately 60 km a speed of 393-5 front of the Seocho-gu Seoul Western-dong from the intersection to the parallel direction at the intersection.

Since there are vehicles that stop the signal parking in that place, the defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to reduce the speed of the vehicle and to safely drive the vehicle and prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to live well in front of the vehicle while driving so under the influence of alcohol, and proceeded without reducing speed, followed by the victim D(the age of 31) who was a traffic signal stop in front of the same lane in the same direction as the Defendant, was driven by the victim D(the age of 31) who was driving the vehicle in front of the same direction, and was driving the vehicle in front of the above Defendant’s vehicle, and the victim F(the age of 24) who was waiting for the traffic signal in front of the vehicle in front of the above Defendant’s vehicle was able to get the part behind the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence inflicted injury on the pertinent P, such as salt panion, etc. in the light that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and inflicted injury on the H (the age 22) of the said P, such as climatic and climatic salt, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, injury on the climatic salt, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the said F, and injury on the climatic salt, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim I (the age 23), and at the same time, suffered from the climatic salt, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the said P, and at the same time, damaged the repair cost of the said Pua car to the extent of KRW 129,374,300, and the repair cost of the said Pua car to the extent of KRW 1,275,032.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each traffic accident report;