The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On February 23, 2012, the Defendant entered the central library, etc. of the above school located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and invaded the building managed by the victim educational foundation D Private Teaching Institutes to perform the missionary work, despite the Defendant’s demand that the said school, which has the doctrine of the construction of the doctrine of the doctrine of the doctrine of the doctrine of the doctrine of the doctrine of the doctrine of the doctrine of the doctrine of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law

2. The instant public prosecution was instituted under the premise that the Defendant entered the Central Library of D University to perform missionary activities, and this is examined.

According to the records of this case, the Defendant, a vocational career teacher, returned to the university located in Seoul and is conducting missionary work against university students. ② The Defendant entered the D University to conduct mission work three to four times a week from January 2012 to January 1, 201, and ③ around February 2012, the Defendant requested from the F, a legal professional of the D University, not to enter the D University, for the purpose of conducting missionary work, from February 2, 2012, the Defendant entered the D University for the purpose of conducting missionary work one to two times a week, and in light of this, there is doubt that the Defendant was not entering the D University Central Library, etc. at the time of the instant case.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the records of the instant case, namely, ① the Defendant consistently stated that the date of the instant case was between the students of the D University who believe that the D University was sexual intercourse with the students of the D University, ② the students of D University I, together with the Defendant, stated that all three persons, including the Defendant, who were enrolled in the D University, engaged in religious-related talks and engage in sexual intercourses on the fourth floor of the Central Library, as the students of the D University, and (iii) stated that all three persons, including the Defendant, who were on the fourth floor of the Central Library.