A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around September 2008, the Defendant was engaged in an import tea purchase agent business with the trade name “C” in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, and the Defendant was willing to receive the purchase price from the person who wants to purchase the imported tea and to repay his/her personal debt with the said money upon receiving the payment from the person who wants to purchase the imported tea.

Around September 10, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D and phone at the above “C” office, and that “The Defendant would purchase a 2008 type of 2008 H2 motor vehicle and send it to Jeju-do after its registration in the United States.”

However, even if the purchase price of the above vehicle was received from the victim, it was used in paying personal debt, and there was no other fund to purchase the above vehicle, so there was no intention or ability to purchase the above vehicle as agreed with the victim.

On September 11, 2013, the Defendant received 34,200,000 won from the victim to the new bank E account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant as the deposit money for the said automobile sales contract and acquired it by fraud.

2. The Defendant, who forged a private document and forged a private document, was requested to purchase the parts and accessories of the motor vehicle in addition to the purchase of the said motor vehicle on October 2013 after acquiring the money for the motor vehicle sales contract as above.

The Defendant: (a) asked the process of the purchase of automobiles and accessories and urged the performance of the contract; (b) purchased automobiles and accessories normally by the Defendant in order to conceal the Defendant’s fraudulent conduct; and (c) by the distribution transport company called the “F” of the United States, the Defendant was willing to forge and present the INVICE in the above F name in order to make sure that automobiles, etc. will be delivered immediately as if they were delivered.

The Defendant, around December 6, 2013, traded in the past at the above C Office, and traded in the F F’s name, which was transmitted by F from F, in the JVOE DAET column by using a computer.