Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a company member.

1. Around 00:20 on December 19, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the coffee shop by force by force, such as: (a) entering the glass outer wall of the said coffee shop in front of Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (b) allowing the victim E to receive a claim from the said coffee; (c) entering the said coffee shop for about 8 minutes from around 00:28 to 00:36 on the same day; (d) making the victim and the employees of the said coffee set sound at the entrance of the coffee shop; and (e) preventing other customers from entering the said coffee shop, thereby obstructing the victim’s operation of the coffee shop by force.

2. In the above date, at the above place, the injured Defendant entered a coffee shop, as seen above, and plucked up and plucked up the Victim F (28 years of age) from his employee F, and inflicted injury on the Victim by plucking, plucking, and plucking the Victim’s face one time with his hand, such as a mid-to-mid water 5 hours of treatment on the right side, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to suspect F’s injury diagnosis report;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant asserted that the defendant only entered the D coffee shop as indicated in the judgment and did not interfere with the operation of the victim E's coffee shop or inflicted any injury on the victim F. Thus, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant was placed on the victim E's outer wall of the above coffee shop and received a claim from the victim E.