Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who works as the head of the D Housing Redevelopment Project Association located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
In the event that the documents and relevant data concerning the implementation of a rearrangement project are prepared or modified, the Defendant did not disclose the "Budget Bill for the Annual Association Budget of 2013" prepared as of February 2, 2013 through the Internet without justifiable grounds within 15 days from the date of preparation, without justifiable grounds, so that its members, etc. can be informed of it.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (report on hearing of the F Opinion for Witnesses);
1. Relevant provisions of the Acts and the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents concerning criminal facts, and Articles 86 subparagraph 6 and 81 (1) of the same Act;
2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.
3. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act for the maintenance and improvement of urban areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, shall be made public in parallel with the Internet and other means within 15 days if the annual fund management plan is prepared or modified as documents concerning the implementation of the rearrangement project, and shall be made public within 15 days if the plan is violated, and shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than one year or by a fine not exceeding ten million won if the violation is committed. In light of the legislative intent of making public by means of "public disclosure" rather than a simple "public disclosure", the defendant disclosed the budget bill of this case
Even if such act was not open to the Internet at the time, the defendant is bound to bear corresponding responsibilities, which was not accurately aware of the contents of the above laws and regulations.
or some of the practitioners' errors or mistakes are involved.
Even if it is not possible to change.
Therefore, it is true.