logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.17 2017고단2865
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2017, the Defendant had C, a certified judicial scrivener belonging to the above office, prepare a false complaint under the name of son with the aim of having C, who was omitted in a certified judicial scrivener office where the name of the Seoul Southern Southern District Court in Yangcheon-gu Seoul is unknown, with the aim of having C punished criminal punishment.

A written complaint is that “A person who is acquired by transfer in the name of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Apartment 205 Dong 401, which is named in C on February 27, 2015, and C agrees to set up a collateral security right (the maximum amount of the claim, KRW 70,800,000, and KRW 36,000,000) on September 24, 2004 and May 16, 2014, to bear the principal and interest of the borrowed bank loans, and received the registration of ownership transfer.

However, there is no fact that, at the time of transfer of ownership, a lease contract is prepared stating the purport that the remainder of the real estate purchase price will be replaced by the lease deposit, 150,000,000 won, the lease contract period of 24 months, and the lease contract is replaced by the lease deposit.

Nevertheless, it is the purport that C requires C to change the amount of security deposit on the basis of a forged pre-sale agreement, which is 24 months after the date of the sales contract.

However, at the time of the transfer of ownership, the Defendant prepared a charter agreement with C as above, and C had not arbitrarily affixed D’s seal on the charter agreement.

Nevertheless, on April 7, 2017, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint to the officials in charge who are unable to know their names at the Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor's Office's Office's Office in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu. 390.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to be mitigated by law;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment].

arrow