The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. According to the evidence No. 1-1 and evidence No. 4, the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff remitted to the Defendant, the amount of KRW 15 million on June 28, 2016, and the amount of KRW 20 million on October 21, 2019.

2. The plaintiff asserts that the above 15 million won and 20 million won are loans, the defendant, who received the above money from the plaintiff, and even if the plaintiff lent the money, the plaintiff expressed his/her intent of exemption from obligations.

3. Determination

A. On June 28, 2016, each statement in Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 2 (including virtual numbers) revealed to the extent that the plaintiff and the defendant maintained a close relationship with the defendant to the extent that he/she did so together, and on June 28, 2016, the plaintiff did not demand any payment at all after he/she paid the defendant the above KRW 15 million to the defendant on June 28, 2016. In light of the following circumstances, around June 2019, the plaintiff asserted that the defendant was a loan of KRW 15 million and demanded the repayment of the loan, and around January 2020, the plaintiff and the defendant alleged that they did not have any claim against the defendant against the defendant, there is no evidence to acknowledge the loan No. 1 and 15 million won as the loan evidence No. 1 and 15 million won.

B. In light of the facts acknowledged earlier with respect to KRW 20 million on October 21, 2019, the possibility that the Plaintiff donated the above KRW 20 million to the Defendant cannot be ruled out. It is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff as a loan solely with the statement of evidence No. 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it as a loan.

4. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.