logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.11.30 2017고단2100
응급의료에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates Acts on emergency medical services or who inflicts an injury shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment, or medical treatment of an emergency patient engaged in emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat, or other means, or destroy, damage, or occupy medical facilities, equipment, medicines, or other objects for emergency medical services provided by a medical institution, etc.;

Nevertheless, at around 21:55 on August 18, 2017, the Defendant, within the emergency medical center of the D Hospital located in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, in order to take a bath while under the influence of alcohol, was engaged in an emergency medical service while working in the above emergency medical center, and was engaged in assaulting the victim, such as being at the time of a private victim E (V, age 24) of nursing, thereby taking approximately two weeks of treatment.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the rescue, transportation, emergency treatment or treatment of emergency patients, and at the same time injured the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and the victim’s injury caused the victim G(32 tax) by causing the Defendant and soliciting the Defendant to undergo hospital treatment on the ground that the Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) and at the place specified in paragraph (1), 112, she avoided disturbance, as described in paragraph (1), brought the victim’s chest part of the victim’s chest, she was in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each self-statement of E, H and I;

1. Notification to the department related to the report of 112 case;

1. A photo of the damaged part;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV images photographs;

1. Article 60(1)1 and 60(1)1 of the Emergency Medical Service Act on criminal facts;

arrow