1. Defendant B, C, and D jointly share KRW 7 million with the Plaintiff and their relation thereto from October 25, 2018 to December 10, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 9, 2018, an incorporated association L (hereinafter “Federation”) decided to hold the 9th regular meeting for the election of chief directors at around 13:30 on February 21, 2018.

The plaintiff, a member of the Federation, and M&C respectively.

However, the Seoul Central District Court 2018Kahap20107 filed a provisional disposition seeking suspension of the validity of candidate registration for M, and the court accepted it, and the Federation decided to cancel the convocation of the above general meeting on February 20, 2018, which is the day before the scheduled date of the holding.

Plaintiff

On February 21, 2018, 91 members elected the plaintiff as the chief director through the procedure of gathering at the place of the scheduled general meeting.

Based on this, the Plaintiff filed a provisional disposition against the Federation on May 2, 2018 with the Seoul Central District Court 2018Kahap20318, which requested that the Federation be temporarily designated as the president and the president of the Federation. However, the court rejected the application on May 2, 2018.

B. On May 21, 2018, the Federation publicly announced that an election of the 10th general meeting and executive officers (hereinafter “the 10th general meeting”) for the election of the president was held on July 4, 2018, and the Federation did not register as a candidate for the president no later than May 30, 2018, which was the closing date for candidate registration.

On June 7, 2018, the election commission of the Federation held a meeting at Defendant E (Chairperson of Election Management), F, G, H, I, J, and K (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendant E, etc.”) and decided to deprive the Plaintiff of the qualification of the candidate for the chief director on the following grounds: (a) the election commission of the Federation held a meeting; and (b) the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff.

1.The promotion of confidence among members;

2. The person has induced the local appraisal and has been in favor of himself; and

3. from time to time sell a decent Dong-to-face (non-Subrogation)

4. Causing damage to the reputation or financial loss of the federation (Complaint or accusation);

5. It is publicly known that the Association does not recognize a line of view with the Association.