Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. (i) Defendant 1 was guilty of facts that the Defendant used to repay the principal and interest of the above victim’s loan and invested in the stock futures option with the above victim’s management approval, and there was no deception by the said victim, nor did the said victims enticed while borrowing money from the victim L andO, and did not have the intent of deceiving the said victims and defraudation.

B. In light of the fact that the Defendant was the primary offender of an unreasonable sentencing, the Defendant’s total of KRW 270,323,000 to the victim K, the Defendant’s total of KRW 14,520,000 to the victim L, and the Defendant’s repayment of KRW 3.5 million to the victimO, etc., the sentence of the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the following, the lower court’s punishment is too unfasible and unfair in view of the following: (a) the Defendant continued to engage in deception by taking advantage of a friendly relationship; (b) the amount of deception obtained by deception is more than KRW 500 million; and (c) even though the Defendant used personal debt repayment or stock investment money by defraudation, the Defendant transferred the responsibility to the Victim K and does not reflect it

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 ⑴ 피해자 K에 대한 사기의 점에 관한 판단 ㈎ 원심의 판단 요지 원심은, ① 피고인은 2006년경 개인 채무 2,500만 원을 변제하지 못하여 신용회복위원회에 개인 워크아웃을 신청하였고, 급여는 계속하여 급감하는 반면에 주식 등의 투자 실패로 인한 누적 손실과 지인들로부터 빌린 채무액이 급증하는 상황이면서도 피해자에게 차용금을 곧 변제할 것처럼 이야기하여 돈을 교부받은 점, ② 피고인이 피해자에게 보여 준 신한증권 주식예탁금 7억 원 중 피고인의 돈은 4,000만 원뿐이었는데도 이를 알리지 아니하고 마치 7억 원 전부가 피고인의 소유인 것처럼 말하면서 피고인의 자산상태를 속인 점, ③ 피고인은 주식이나, 선물, 옵션 투자에 대하여 특별한...