The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around February 15, 2019, the Defendant employed the Victim B (the 78 years of age) as a medical care protection physician and sent contact with the victim. However, around July 2019, the victim unilaterally ended with the Defendant, and ended on September 27, 2019, the victim ended from the 23:23 of the 2019. A. A. A. A. A. A. I introduced the 8th anniversary of this, the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with 8th anniversary of the 8th anniversary of the 8th anniversary of this, the Defendant’s physical. physical pain field was 700,000 won in cash, 60,000,000 won, and 1.0,0000,0000 won, and 1.4.0,000,000,000 won, and 1.0,0000,000,000,000.

Whether or not a tea slavedr can not be improved.

The contents of the four-year test are known to the public. Whether there is any person who is prior to the public.

“Along with the transmission of the text message to the victim’s cell phone, the message was sent to the victim’s cell phone at least 214 times from that time until April 6, 2020, including the transmission of the text message to the victim’s cell phone.

As a result, the Defendant repeatedly sent letters that arouse fears or apprehensions through information and communications networks to the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable Act: Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Protection, etc. of Information;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 74 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

C. On January 18, 2021, after the prosecution of this case, the victim was not punished.

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;