A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On October 18, 1982, the Defendant: (a) was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 23, 1985; (b) six months from the Daejeon District Court on September 7, 198 to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny; (c) ten months from October 16 from the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; (d) one year from the Chuncheon District Court on December 3, 1997 to one year from the suspension of execution; (e) three years from the imprisonment with prison labor for one year from the Chuncheon District Court on May 27, 1998 to 10; and (e) six years from the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes to the Seoul District Court on September 9, 198 to 106; and (e) six years from the Government on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes to 13 months from the Seoul District Court on March 13, 2013, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

In light of the facts charged and applicable provisions of the indictment in this case, the prosecutor appears to have instituted a public prosecution on the premise that each theft committed by the defendant was in the relation of concurrent crimes, but all of the crimes committed by the defendant are by the realization of the same theft habits, and they are in the relation of comprehensive crimes.

The court recognizes the criminal facts prosecuted for concurrent crimes as they are. However, even if the court treats only the legal evaluation on the number of crimes as a single comprehensive crime, it would be disadvantageous to the defendant's defense.