logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원정읍지원 2015.03.25 2014가합708
대여금
Text

1. The defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties jointly and severally to the plaintiff 660,000,000 won and the designated parties thereof on January 31, 2009.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 11, 2004, the Plaintiff and the Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”) entered into an investment contract with the Defendant on March 11, 2004, stating that around March 11, 2004, the Plaintiff would invest KRW 210 million in the Defendant and receive a refund of KRW 310 million in addition to the investment profit. At that time, the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s husband, and the Defendant’s husband, remitted the said investment amount to D’s account.

B. On October 5, 2004, the Plaintiff and the Appointor D’s agreement entered into a sales contract of 3467 square meters in order to make an investment of 230 million won out of the purchase price, on or around April 2, 2004, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement to refund the above KRW 230 million around October 5, 2004.

C. The Plaintiff loaned KRW 20 million to the Defendant and the Appointor’s account from July 2004 to December 2 of the same year.

(1) The loan certificate and written agreement shall be drawn up 10,000,000 won from January 2008, and 200,000,000,000 won from the above investment return, 230,000,000,000 won from the loan, plus interest 10,000,000,000,000 won from the loan, and the defendant and the selected parties shall be the joint debtor, and the loan certificate and written agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the first loan certificate and written agreement at the time of the sale of the real estate owned by the debtor") shall be set up as the loan certificate and written agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the first loan certificate and written agreement").

(B) The Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the Appointor D shall draw up two copies of the first loan certificate and agreement, and keep one copy of each agreement, and among them, the documents possessed by the Plaintiff No. 1-1-2, the documents possessed by the Defendant and the Appointor D are deemed as evidence No. 2-2, and there is a difference in the form of the pen, and the contents written are identical.

2) 2) The Plaintiff entered the second loan certificate and written agreement in the column of the first loan certificate and the date and time of repayment of the agreement in the word “(interest rate of 1% per month, 15 per month).”

arrow