Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed to the Plaintiff KRW 388,500,000 and Defendant A with respect thereto from January 9, 2015, and Defendant B.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company that aims at the distribution business of steel materials, the distribution business of resources (such as scrap metal, scrap metal, etc.), the distribution business of construction materials, etc., and the Defendant A is an individual who engages in the distribution business of steel materials, scrap metal, base metal, etc.
B. On February 14, 2014, the Plaintiff agreed to lend KRW 388,500,000 to Defendant A (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”) as follows.
① Defendant A shall have the Plaintiff enter not less than 1,000 tons of monthly scrap metal, etc.
C. Defendant B and C agreed to guarantee Defendant A’s obligation under the instant loan agreement jointly and severally.
Defendant A did not comply with the terms and conditions under the instant loan agreement.
【Defendant A’s ground for recognition: A’s non-contentious facts, Gap’s evidence 1 [Attachment A’s assertion to the effect that the authenticity of the above loan certificate is denied, but Gap’s evidence 2 (including the paper number; hereinafter the same shall apply) is alleged to the effect that the said loan certificate
In addition to the whole purport of the pleading, the authenticity of its formation shall be recognized), and as to Defendant B and C, the purport of the whole statement and pleading of evidence No. 2
2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 388,500,000 and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from September 27, 2014, the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint, to December 30, 2014, the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint, Defendant B, and Defendant C, from September 27, 2014 to the day of full payment.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.