(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.07.24 2020고정180

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.07.24 2020고정180

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding seven hundred thousand won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was between the neighbors who reside in B Housing C and the victim D (the age of 37) at Jeju, and the defendant and the victim were registered, managed, and used exclusively as a garage, and there was a dispute.

On August 8, 2019, at the entrance of the first floor parking lot of the above house, the Defendant discarded garbage, and opened the entrance door of the entrance of the entrance, and told the victim who had been playing water from the above garage to be opened with the entrance of the entrance of the entrance, and then opened the entrance of the garage. The victim expressed her intention to be opened to the victim who was playing water from the above garage, and on the ground that the victim "I am a low garage," "I am I am off..........................., the victim was knicked with the right hand by her "I am..................", the Defendant discarded waste, and returned to the Defendant, caused the victim by assaulting the victim, such as "the victim's body," which requires the victim to treat for two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement made by the witness D in this court;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Statement of suspect interrogation protocol as to D prepared by the police;

1. Partial statement of the statement of the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Entry of the written statements of D;

1. Statement of a medical certificate with regard to D in preparation of doctor F;

1. Determination on the assertion by each video defendant and defense counsel of the relevant photographs

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant only obstructed the victim by leaving his hand in order to prevent further assault by the victim in a situation where the Defendant was frightened first by drinking the Defendant’s eye and cannot be seen earlier by assaulting the victim.

The defendant's act is nothing more to defend the victim's assault.

Therefore, at the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not have any intention to injure as well as the above act.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2012.10.19 2012고합450

-제주지방법원 2019.10.25 2018고단421

-제주지방법원 2020.07.24 2020고단1160

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.09.02 2015고합93

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.13 2014고정5526