(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.03.28 2014고정97

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.03.28 2014고정97

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A Party R(34 years of age) intended to supply the table table table table to S 2 factory. If the Defendant supplied the table table table table to the said S, the Defendant would pay KRW 5 million for the price.”

However, the fact is that the victim did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim had the S factory deliver the meeting table.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim deliver the table table of a meeting equivalent to KRW 5 million to the above S, and did not pay the price, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On February 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay the price if he supplies the shock to T, because he would have supplied the shock.”

However, there is no intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim delivers shocks to T.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim deliver the show 1,400,000 won of the market price to T, and did not pay the price, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount.

3. On February 28, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would not be able to give the S Chairperson a gift of the Gu affairs, and will deliver a gift to him/her.”

However, the fact does not have the intention or ability to deliver the gifts to the S Chairperson even if they receive gifts from the victims as the personnel affairs of the S Chairperson.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received one Belgium (200,000,000 won) from the victim under the pretext of the personal affairs gift of the S Chairperson for the Gu affairs.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The second statement of the defendant in court; and

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2020.03.18 2019노3489

-광주고등법원 2010. 10. 21. 선고 2010노278 판결

-서울서부지방법원 2017.10.11 2017고단1886

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.04.03 2013고단1391

-의정부지방법원 2018.07.25 2017고단5833