logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.11.16 2020고단1328
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-Epurt Motor Vehicle.

1. Around April 14:15, 2020, the Defendant driving a motor vehicle with blood alcohol content of about 0.101% under the influence of alcohol at approximately 3 km from the 3km-dong, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do to the roads in front of Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle with soflurt which is not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1).

3. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act by driving the said Amblurd-turging motor vehicle around the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) and driving the first line road in front of the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do,

At all times, there were many motor vehicles parked and stopped on the road side, and there was a center line of yellow solid lines, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle with the driver's duty of care by taking the front and right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, as described in Paragraph 1, the Defendant was negligent in the course of duties in which the Defendant driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, such as the walking distance, which makes it difficult to drive normally due to the influence of alcohol, and led to the occupational negligence of driving the motor vehicle with the central line continuously, and the front part of the victim’s G ppppf motor vehicle that is driven in line with the direction of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, injured the victim H (V, 37 years of age) who was on board the above franchising vehicle, and did not have any open two measures for treatment between approximately two weeks, and did so I by the victim I.

arrow