logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.27 2014누57715
별도보상제외처분무효확인등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and it is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding some contents and adding some contents. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the "convalescent Department" of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance shall be considered as the "convalescent Department" of the 7th judgment.

Part 12 of the 15th judgment of the first instance court, “The current status and details of the web survey report at the time of the entry” of the 12th judgment, which read “the current status of the instant hospital at the time of the entry,” as “the current status and

In addition, the following shall be added to the part in the judgment of the court of first instance No. 14 of the 15th judgment:

【D’s statement to the effect that (in preparing a web survey report, D was presented as a witness at the trial, the Director of the Department of original affairs N and the Director of the Department of original affairs, printed out the contents of the report and delivered them to N.

[Judgment]

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow