1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is a person who was engaged in fish farming, such as fish, in the fishing ground around the Yacheon-si, Yacheon-do and the mountain village located around the Yacheon-do, and the intervenor joining the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "participating") is a fishing village fraternity comprised of the fishermen of the Yari-do.

The Defendant, on May 12, 2015, announced “the details of approval on the fishing ground development plan for fishing ground use”. Accordingly, on May 29, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Intervenor filed an application with the Defendant for priority determination of fishery license regarding the water surface number Nos. 3 and 4 (area Nos. 5, 20 (area No. 5, 20) in accordance with the fishing ground use development plan for the Defendant as described in paragraph (a).

On June 9, 2015, pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Fisheries Act, the Defendant submitted a decision of priority to the Plaintiff and the Intervenor for deliberation by the competent fisheries mediation committee. On June 10, 2015, the Boan-si fisheries mediation committee rendered a decision of priority in granting a license for the instant waters pursuant to Article 9(4) of the Fisheries Act (hereinafter referred to as “decision of priority”).

On January 5, 2016, the Plaintiff’s application for a fishery license and the Plaintiff’s return disposition filed an application with the Defendant for a fishery license. On January 6, 2015, the Defendant rejected the application for a fishery license on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s application was rejected on the ground that it was determined on January 6, 2015 to be the second priority in the fishery license as a result of the deliberation by the Boan City Fisheries Coordination Committee on the instant water surface, that the Plaintiff did not apply for a fishery license within the period for filing the application without applying for an extension of the period for filing the application, or that the Plaintiff did not apply for a fishery license

hereinafter referred to as "disposition for Return of this case"

(iii)(s)(s).