The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Criminal facts have to be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, the selection of evidence and probative value of evidence conducted on the premise of fact finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court.

(Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court determined that the Defendant did not take proper measures under Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as the victim’s relief, and rejected the Defendant’s allegation of grounds for appeal as to mistake of facts or misapprehension of

The ground of appeal disputing such fact-finding by the lower court is merely an error of the lower court’s determination on the evidence selection and probative value, which belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court.

In addition, the reasoning of the judgment below is examined in light of the legal principles of the judgment below and the evidence duly admitted, and there is no error of misapprehending the legal principles as to the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes or exceeding the bounds of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.