logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2021.03.11 2020다262076
임금
Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Of the costs of appeal, the Plaintiff’s appeal is due to the Defendant’s appeal.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the Plaintiff’s appeal, the lower court calculated the unpaid wage payable to the Plaintiff on the premise that the agreement was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the payment of the comprehensive wage system effective between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal doctrine and the record, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the comprehensive wage system wage payment agreement, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. As to the Defendant’s appeal, the Defendant did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal, and did not submit the grounds for appeal within the submission period of legitimate grounds for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. Of the costs of appeal by the Plaintiff, the costs of appeal by the Plaintiff are assessed against the Plaintiff, and the costs of appeal by the Defendant are assessed against the Defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow