The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasons for our court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to the following Paragraph 2, and the reasons for admitting the case shall be as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, in order to deduct the phrase "the June 12, 2012" from the phrase "the June 21, 2012" as "the June 21, 2012."

[Defendants are specified in the first instance trial only in number (2) through (7), (1) through (5) of the article of this case as the article of this case with false report of the first instance court.

(1) Although dispute is not a false report, Gap evidence 6-3, 46, 48, 52, 54, 55, 57, 64, 85, 86, 88, 95, 100, 100, 101, 111 of Gap evidence 8, 9-1, 2, 3, 10-1 through 4, 11-1, 10 evidence 1, 10-1, 2, and 13 of Eul evidence 10, 2, 7, 50, 52, 54, 57, 64, 85, 86, 86, 95, 10, 100, 100, 101, and 10-1 through 4, 10-1, 2, and 13 of the whole pleadings, it is not sufficient to prove any other part of the defendants' reply to the submission order.

A. The Defendants, in the preparatory document dated June 11, 2014, led to the confession that the part was false; however, they asserted that the part was cancelled due to mistake. As such, in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the evidence No. 13, the Defendant’s criminal case, as a whole, can be acknowledged that the judgment of not guilty of the facts such as the fact of defamation by publication on the part (8) and the fact of violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation). However, the court of the lawsuit at the time deemed that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that Defendant E had false knowledge, and thus, the Defendants