logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2004.10.21 2004고단2414
도로법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be prohibited.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who drives B truck belonging to oil hold comprehensive transportation company, and the defendant oil hold comprehensive transportation company is a corporation with the purpose of truck transportation business.

1. On February 24, 2004, at around 06:15, Defendant A violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating the relevant truck in a condition exceeding 2.93m with the restricted width exceeding 2.5m in the 45m limit (influoral vehicle control (fluoral) of the National Highway 45 line Yan-Eup of Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do.

2. The same integrated transportation company has committed the same act of violation as the above A, who is an employee with respect to its business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of the defendant A;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a report on detection;

1. Any joint transport company by Defendant under Articles 83 (1) 2 and 54 (1) of the Road Act for criminal facts: Article 86 of the Road Act;

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (including cases where a summary order is requested, circumstances, reflectivity, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act shall be confined in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;

arrow