1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4 as to the cause of the claim, the Handong Mutual Savings and Finance Company loaned KRW 2 million to the defendant around December 12, 2001, and thereafter transferred the above claim against the defendant to the plaintiff via Hansung F&C, Han Han L&C, and Han L&C, and the claim amount against the plaintiff against the defendant can be acknowledged as constituting KRW 8,288,524 as of June 4, 2012 (the principal amount of KRW 6,288,524 as of June 4, 2012). Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the above loan amount to the plaintiff, barring special circumstances.

2. The defendant asserts that the defendant's claim against the defendant against the plaintiff was extinguished by the lapse of five years.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as indicated in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the Plaintiff’s above loan claims against the Defendant are commercial claims subject to the five-year extinctive prescription, and the Plaintiff’s failure to take any measures for interrupting prescription against the Defendant for the period of the calendar period from June 18, 2012, which was the date on which the instant lawsuit was filed, until five years elapsed.

According to the above facts, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant was extinguished by the statute of limitations.

The defendant's defense is justified.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair as the conclusion is different, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.