A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant was aware that he had been in common.

D (M, 60 years old) known that E in 20 lots (F, G, H, I, J, K, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, X, Y) and R et al. on the ground (hereinafter collectively referred to as "each of the instant real estate") located in the Southern-gun of the Republic of Korea that he owns should receive a loan from a financial institution as security, and had access to the victim, who is aware that he would receive a loan from a financial institution.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant called “D to know well about the president of the Z in the world and to know about the loan,” at a mutual influent restaurant located in the Nam-gun, the Nam-gun, the Republic of Korea: (a) on February 28, 2014, at the request of D, 50 million won was loaned from the Z as collateral of each of the instant real estate to the victim, stating that “the above loan was created because it was well visible to the President of the Z in the Yellow-gun, the board of directors of the Z, the board of directors of the Z, the board of directors of the Z, the board of directors of the Z, and the board of directors of the Y-gun, the board of directors of the Y-gun, the board of directors of the Y-gun, the board of directors of the Y-gun, the board of directors of the Y-gun, in cash,

Around June 2014, the Defendant continued to provide the above victim with a loan handling institution to AA in order to change the loan handling institution as the person in charge of the Z in order to know about the extension of loan, etc., and the Defendant changed the institution dealing with the loan of each of the instant real estate at the request of the injured party on July 3, 2014, and received KRW 1 billion in total from the victim upon the victim’s loaning KRW 1 billion to the institution dealing with the loan of each of the instant real estate at the request of the injured party, stating that “if the loan was not paid, it was difficult to grant the above loan to the victim, but the compensation for the loan was changed.” On August 7, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 10 million under the name of the agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant as the reward for loan brokerage.

In the end, the Defendant received 25 million won through two times about arranging matters related to the duties of executive officers and employees of financial companies.

Summary of Evidence

1. D Legal statements;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. AB, AC,.