The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes in this case, the defendant committed a crime in a state of mental disability with intellectual disability Grade 3, and the defendant returned the damaged goods to the victim, and some of the damaged goods were returned to the victims, and the fact that the court below agreed with the six victims is favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime in 209 and 2014; (b) even during the suspended sentence period, the Defendant left to each of the instant crimes; (c) the number of crimes is more than 12 times in total; and (d) the sum of the theft amount is not much significant; and (c) the remaining victims were unable to agree with each of the instant victims up to the trial; and (d) other conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the character, conduct, age, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the sentence imposed by

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.