A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The victim shall have a copy (No. 4) of the seized Orar Epil (Fl.).

Punishment of the crime

On September 10, 1987, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a maximum term of two years and for a short term of one year and six months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul High Court, on March 23, 1990, sentenced to two years for the same crime at the Seoul Central District Court, on July 31, 1998, sentenced to three years for the same crime at the same court. On April 28, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to four years for imprisonment for the same crime at the same court and completed the execution of the sentence on March 27, 2014 after having been sentenced to three years for the same crime at the same court on August 26, 201.

On November 29, 2016, at around 13:30, the Defendant discovered one CT100, 800, CT100,000 cT10,000 cT10,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,00,000 c&1,000 c&1,000 c&1,00,00 from around 6 times to December 8, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, F, G, and D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Each report on the occurrence of a theft, report on the occurrence of a theft, report on an investigation (Attachment of seized photographs), report on an investigation (a CCTV investigation-crime in H), investigation report (a counter-investigation of the victim of a larceny), investigation report (a counter-investigation of the victim of a larceny), report on internal investigation (a confirmation of CCTV image records in an area adjacent to the point in which the occurrence of the incident occurred), investigation report (a counter-investigation of the victim of the incident of November 29 (the recovery of part of the damaged items)), investigation report (including on-site CCTV cases), investigation report, and tracking of the suspect line before and after the crime was committed;

1. Previous convictions: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to criminal suspects, repeated criminal records, etc.), judgment attached thereto, and current status of personal confinement;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The application of the law to recognize the habition of larceny is one of the following, in light of the records of each crime in the judgment, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated in a planned manner;