logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단4094
살인예비등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

A seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In 2014, the Defendant received the Defendant’s printer C (43 tax) from the victim who was a repair engineer of a horse in around 2014 and claimed excessive expenses.

I think of this, I think that I would like to think that I would like to think of it, and that I would like to find the victim who was working at the D Yeongdeungpo-gu Center located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, while visiting the victim who was working at the D Center located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, around 16:05 on August 11, 2016, after identifying the address of the Down-gu Center where I would work for the victim through D head office, and after carrying the food map (30 centimeters in total length and 20 centimeters in length in length in length) in the defendant's house, I tried to kill the victim.

The victim threatened the victim by referring to the "Mai (Mai)".

2. Special assaulting the Defendant carried the 1st time and place dangerous objects, and assaulted the victim by taking the head and face of the victim by drinking and salivating the victim’s head and face, and destroying his head and saliva.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of C, F, and G;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor and police with regard to C;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Application of seizure records, list of seizure, photographs of criminal tools, and damaged statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of special intimidation), Articles 261, 260(1) (a) (a point of special assault) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel subject to Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, who had mental and physical weakness due to mental illness at the time of committing the instant crime;

The argument is asserted.

Along with the fact that the Defendant was suffering from mental illness at the time of committing the crime, such as depression, coercion, or laver, it is recognized that the Defendant was suffering from mental illness at the time of committing the crime, in view of various circumstances such as the background, means and method of each of the crimes, and the behavior of the Defendant before and after the crime.

arrow