logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고단4114
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 11, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Incheon District Court to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and on June 17, 2009, a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine of KRW 1,50,00 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On June 29, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.134% during blood transfusion, driven a nived vehicle B at around 0.134%, and proceeded with approximately two kilometers from the training station near the Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon to the front road of the training stadium located in 526, as Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous conviction: References to inquiries, investigation reports (Attachment to the summary order of the same kind of suspect), and copies of the summary order attached thereto; and

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Criminal Procedure of the Provisional Payment Order is that the Defendant is not less than the nature of the crime in this case where the Defendant drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol two times due to driving of alcohol, despite the fact that the Defendant had the record of the same kind of crime, but does not seem to violate other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, but does not reach the point of violating other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, later, his mistake is divided, and the Defendant must support the wife and his child in the sick region, taking into account the circumstances in which the Defendant’s age, sex, occupation, environment, family relationship, etc., and determine the punishment as above.

arrow