1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the amount of KRW 86,906,298 and KRW 21,989,50 among them from October 13, 2015 to the day of full payment.

1. The facts in the attached Form of the judgment on the cause of the claim are recognized by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the entries and arguments in Gap 1-1 and Gap 6 (it can be deemed that the plaintiff notified the assignment of claims as the assignee of claims delegated by the transferor of claims through the delivery of a duplicate of the complaint in this case, even if the plaintiff did not notify the assignment of claims at the time so claimed by the plaintiff, as alleged by the defendant). The defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the amount set forth in paragraph (1)

2. The judgment on the defendant's assertion that the plaintiff's new credit card and lot card's credit card's credit card's credit credit card's credit credit card's credit card's credit credit card's credit credit card's credit credit card's credit credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit card's credit.

However, since the fact that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case on October 14, 2015, which was before 10 years from the date the above judgment became final and conclusive, is apparent in the record, the defendant's defense of extinctive prescription is not justified, and the plaintiff's assertion pointing this out is with merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim is justified.