logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.31 2017가합503215
손해배상(지)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiffs of the first registered design of this case are owners of the design right as to the following registered design (hereinafter referred to as the "first registered design of this case"): (A) Date of application of the first registered design of this case; (B) Date of registration of / Registration Number: D/ E/F (Fc): (1) Materials are used to support mination or rice, as in the state of use, at the inside of a mination machine, which is installed in a mination machine to support mination or rice as in the state of use; (2) Main design of this case is used to support mination: Main drawings of the shape and shape of the mination support unit, the main design of this case, as in the state of use: (e) The combination of the shape and shape of the mination support unit, the main design of this case, is the main design of the design of this case: (2) The plaintiff of the second registered design of this case, as in attached Table 1(1).

(A) The design is the owner of the design right in relation to B. A. The date of application for laver b), the date of registration / The registration number: (1) the description of the design in D/E/G: (2) the material is metal (2) the main design is used as seded with the installation of a laver or a laver support unit for laverr, etc. installed at the lower part of a laverr that lavers or rice are lavered, as in the state of use: The main design is installed in the front bank, and three lavers are installed in the later bank, but the two lavers are installed in the center, and the first lavers are installed in the later bank, and the main list of drawings in attached Table 1(2).

The Defendant’s in-house director H established the Defendant on January 25, 2016, with the trade name “C” from around 1987.

Since then, the defendant is not more than 'the defendant' as stated in paragraph (1) and (2) of attached Table 2.

arrow