1. The Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area 287 square meters and the attached appraisal sheet 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13.

1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, at the time of port of port, share the Plaintiff 131/287 and the Defendant 156/287 square meters in proportion to the shares of the parties. Thus, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of the land of this case, may claim a partition of the land of this case against the Defendant based on his co-ownership.

2. Method of partition of co-owned property;

A. Division of the relevant legal doctrine-based co-ownership can be selected at will if the co-owners reach an agreement, but if the co-ownership is divided through a trial due to the failure to reach an agreement, the court shall divide it in kind in principle. If it is impossible to divide it in kind or if it is possible to divide it in kind in kind, the value of the property may be reduced remarkably, the auction of the property may be ordered to pay the price.

Therefore, barring such circumstances, barring any circumstance as above, the court shall render a judgment recognizing the sole ownership of each co-owner for the divided goods by dividing the jointly owned property into several goods in kind according to the share ratio of each co-owner, and the method of division shall be determined by the reasonable division according to the share ratio of co-owner according to the co-owner's share ratio according to the court's discretion and the overall situation of the goods, which are the objects of the

In addition, when land is partitioned, in principle, the area of land to be acquired by each co-owner shall be equal to the ratio of the co-owner's co-ownership. However, it is not necessarily required to be divided in such a way, but it is also allowed to divide the economic value in proportion to the share ratio in consideration of the shape, location, utilization situation, or economic value of the land, if the form, location, use situation, or economic value of the land is not equal.