beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 22, 2019, a person who was not aware of the cause of the fraud aiding and abetting organization against the victim B, was falsely made to the effect that “A bank staff is misrepresented by phone call to the victim B at a place not known to him/her at least 12:00, and that “a loan can be lent at a lower rate than the credit rating if an existing loan is repaid.”
However, there was no intention or ability to provide loans at a low interest rate even if they receive cash from the victim as a result of the purpose of deceiving the victim by deceiving the victim through the Bosing method.
Nevertheless, the person under whose name the victim was accused of the victim as above and was transferred 6 million won to the bank account (E) in the name of the defendant around 13:00 on April 23, 2019 by deceiving the victim as above.
The Defendant, with knowledge of the fact that it was used for the crime of Bosing fraud in order to assist the Defendants in committing the above fraud, aided and abetted the commission of the crime of fraud by persons without a name, by withdrawing KRW 6 million deposited by the victim from Seoul Seocho-gu, Seoul, from April 23, 2019 to April 13:43 of the same day, and from the “G Cooperatives” to the designated person, pursuant to the instructions of the persons without a name, and delivering the same to the designated person, thereby facilitating the commission of the crime.
2. On April 23, 2019, at a place where it is impossible to know at around 13:18, 2019, the victim H made a false statement to the effect that “the name and the poor person, who caused the fraud aiding and abetting organization, visited the victim H by using mobile phone “I,” thereby misrepresenting the victim’s children, and “the head of the family-gu passbook exceeded the maximum limit, and there was an error in the transfer of the ten million won, instead of paying the bank deposit.”
However, the fact is that the person who is not aware of the name has the purpose of deceiving the victim by deceiving the victim by misrepresenting the child of the victim, and even if he has received the money from the victim, it is a security deposit.