beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant B, and for a period of ten months of imprisonment for a defendant C, respectively.
(b).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendants do not have a certain occupation, and the victim J and K are unregistered money exchange operators residing in the Philippines, and when they receive won currency from clients wishing to transfer from Korea to the Philippines in the domestic account opened by them, they are engaged in money exchange business in the manner of a "recoveration" which is paid by the remitter to those designated by the remitters for the Republic of Korea.
The Defendants, with the knowledge that there is a large amount of money and fraud damage caused by money exchange business operators, such as the victims, were unable to report damage to the police easily due to illegal money exchange business problems. They deposited money into domestic accounts of money exchange business operators and received money in the territory of the Philippines, and then received money from financial institutions, etc., which requested suspension of payment of deposit accounts as if they were victims of “Sishing” and received money from the victims by receiving money from the victims.
The Defendants led and supervised this case, and, as Defendant B and Defendant C deposited money to the victims in the Republic of Korea and had them reported falsely to financial institutions, etc. to take charge of the role of suspending payment of the victims’ accounts (hereinafter “domestic team”), and Defendant A was in charge of the role of delivering money from the victims in the Philippines to Defendant A, M, and N, or allowing Defendant A to take charge of the role of delivering money from the victims in the Republic of Korea to Defendant A or lending a mobile phone to Defendant A (hereinafter “the Philippines team”).
1. In accordance with the aforementioned role-sharing plan, the Defendants: (a) around September 20, 2015, at the bar of the Philippines, the Defendants: (b) filed an application for suspension of payment to the deposit account with the financial institution after depositing the money into the account of the victimJ; and (c) notwithstanding that they were not able to withdraw the deposit money, the Defendants A.