beta
Text
Defendant
The punishment against A shall be one year, and the imprisonment for Defendant B shall be two months, respectively.
except that this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant B, on May 31, 2017, sentenced Defendant B to the imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and two months of suspended execution on June 8, 2017, the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 31, 2017.
1. On August 9, 2018, Defendant A and C, D, and E’s co-principal activities, around 19:00, Defendant A and C, D, and E were in the residence of the F Building G at Dongducheon-si, 2018, and C were to take charge of making soup and making soup to Seoul located at the night time, theft of the cell phone of the customers, and taking them out and use them in installments, and other Defendants agree thereto. Defendant A drives a vehicle to the place of crime and waiting in the vicinity of the place of crime; Defendant A’s role in driving the vehicle to the place of crime; the role in keeping the cell phone by reporting the network at the vehicle; and C was to take charge of preparing vehicles to be used for crime and printing the cell phone sales place.
Defendant
A, D, and E, around 02:00 on August 22, 2018, in accordance with the above public offering, when they board a vehicle driven by Defendant A in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and they came into the Igalth of H, E has been suffering from human beings, and they entered the above Health of Y, and then have one cellular phone flag of 1.50,000 won at the market price of the victim J. who was in possession of the victim J. who was leaving and diving back the mobile phone, and Defendant A and D had a network while waiting in a vehicle installed in a neighboring place.
As a result, Defendant A, D, and E combined with them, C stolen the victim’s mobile phone device from August 25, 2018 to August 05:00, and thereafter, C stolen three mobile phone devices of the victims amounting to KRW 1,650,00 in total on three occasions, including the theft of the victim’s mobile phone device.
2. Defendant B, etc., who lent the name in which C had lent a vehicle siren and had been urged to pay the rental fee because C was unable to receive the rental fee.