logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고단5184
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and fines for 4,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A In Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel 1325, 1001 and 1203, a person who operates a commercial sex trafficking business establishment called "E", and Defendant B is an employee of the above business establishment.

On August 26, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendants received KRW 1.50,000 from a male who cannot know his/her name at the above sexual traffic business establishment, and arrange for sexual intercourse with F, a female sexual traffic, and conspired with the Defendants from July 28, 2014 to August 26, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of G, H, I, J, K, L, or M;

1. Voluntary report;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of lease contract Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The choice of punishment by each of the Defendants and the concurrent punishment of Defendant A

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, each of the suspended execution (the defendants);

1. The community service order (defendants) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. (Defendant A) Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Additional collection (Defendant A) Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (Reasons for Calculation of Additional Collection Charges: Examination of Prosecutor on the Defendant);

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the scope of recommendations) is [the grounds for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order (the defendant A). The aggravated area (1 to 3 years), such as the two types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older, the mediation of commercial sex acts, etc. (1 to 1 year and 3 years), [the person under special circumstances] advertising or mediation using highly radio waves (the decision of sentence] Defendant A led the instant act of arranging commercial sex acts as the owner of the business, and Defendant B was an employee.

However, the defendant A does not have the same criminal record, and the defendant B has the same criminal record as the previous one.

arrow