Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Injury;

A. On May 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00 on May 2, 201, around 10:0, the Defendant 302 of the Gumi-si B Building 302, on the ground that the Defendant’s wife C (the age of 33) drinks the victim’s face at 3-4 times in her hand, pushed the victim’s neck in her hand, pushed the victim’s neck on her hand, and pushed the victim over her floor, thereby requiring approximately 14 days of treatment.

B. At around 22:00 on June 26, 2013, the Defendant was under dispute with the said victim during the influence of alcohol in the room of the cosmetic room located in Guro-si, Masi-si, and was under dispute due to the cost of living and divorce with the said victim, and the victim was under dispute with the victim on the ground that the victim's talks with the first spirit after drinking, and returned the Defendant, due to the victim's loss, she saw the victim's her humb and went back to the lower end, and her 14-day treatment was required.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the same date and time as paragraph 1(b), and at a place as set forth in paragraph 1(b), destroyed that the said victim recorded a conversation between the Defendant and the victim with a smartphone, which is the ownership of the said victim, by placing the gallon jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus 3

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (referring to the receipt of a written diagnosis of injury and a written estimate for damage);

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. All circumstances, such as the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the wrong reasoning for sentencing, the fact that the victim agreed smoothly with the victim, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment of the same kind, and the relationship with the victim.