Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the same workplace club with the victim C (n, 54 years old) and is not good for the family union of the Pyeongtaek company.

On February 1, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim's shoulder part by hand on two occasions on the ground that the injured party in the E-work site of Kimhae-si, Inc., Inc., Ltd., in Kimhae-si, took out lending and borrowing (the movement of the meat processed product) in the process of his work, and was living in the horse match with the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness C’s legal statement (as to the Defendant’s act, content of damage, the fear and response of the victim, and the situation before and after the commission of the crime, is consistent and concrete.

The contents of statements are inconsistent with other evidence.

Unlike the circumstances where false information on the victim's statement is not visible, and credibility is recognized in light of the attitude of the victim's statement in this court

1. Results of this Court for viewing CD reproduction;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs after each closure;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant's conduct does not constitute a crime by blocking illegality as an act socially reasonable or a legitimate act.

2. Considering the circumstances indicated in the records, such as the background of the instant case, the response of the Defendant, and the degree of physical fighting, the aforementioned assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel is not acceptable, since the instant crime is deemed a justifiable act with social reasonableness, or not contrary to social rules, etc.