logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.10.19 2016고합53
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,200,00, by a fine of KRW 700,000, by each fine of KRW 700,00.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall distribute, post, spread, screen, or run an advertisement, personnel management place, poster, photograph, document, drawing, drawing, printed matter, recording tape, and others similar thereto which indicate the name of a political party or candidate's name from 180 days prior to the election day to the election day, with the aim of influencing the election, without resorting to the provisions of the Public Official Election Act.

Defendant

A is an election campaign worker of a candidate H, who was going to the 20th election constituency for the National Assembly member conducted on April 13, 2016, and Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E are an election campaign worker of a candidate for H candidate.

Defendant

A had the election campaign workers, etc. distribute the name cards containing the candidate’s name, photograph, and career to the apartment house, etc. on April 7, 2016, at the election campaign liaison office of H candidate H candidate I located in the former North Korea, around 07:30 on April 7, 2016, Defendant B instructed that “I would pay attention to the candidate’s election campaign worker in the J apartment or large apartment complex, as Article 4 first of all in J apartment or large apartment complex, which is located in J apartment or large apartment complex, and that I will return the name cards intensively around it.” The Defendant B sent the above instructions to Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E.

Accordingly, from April 7, 2016 to April 8, 2016, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E distributed 1,393 name cards of H candidate to J apartment, K apartment, L apartment, L apartment, M apartment, M apartment, N apartment, N apartment, N apartment, N apartment, and OB, P apartment, Q apartment, M apartment, TR apartment, TR apartment, M apartment, V rental, W apartment, and X mail box.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to distribute the name cards of the candidate by illegal means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Ascertainments of non-performance of post boxes for H candidates, evidentiary materials.

arrow