All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. On the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of a crime as to the part of indecent act by compulsion committed by force on October 25, 2018, among the facts charged in the instant case, on the grounds that there was no proof of crime regarding the part of indecent act by force.

Examining the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but did not state specific grounds for objection on the guilty portion in the petition of appeal or the appellate brief.

2. On the grounds of appeal by the Defendant, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the remainder of the facts charged except the aforementioned acquittal portion among the facts charged in the instant case.

Examining the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the specification of facts charged.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.