1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs of appeal shall be individually considered.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "multi-family house" in the 2th, 6, and 7th, of the judgment of the court of the first instance is as "multi-family house"; "B" in the 12th, 2, 4, 9, and 12th, "B" in the 12th, 2, 4, 5, 9, and 12th, 3th, 4, and 5th, 3th, 4, and 5th, and the building area is similar to the actual construction area of 197.15 square meters in the actual completion of the house of this case; "B" does not differ from the area of the first agreed upon by the plaintiff and the defendant on 197.15 square meters in the actual completion of the house of this case, and "B" in the 4th, 4th, 394 square meters in the area of "B" and "B" in the 197th, 4th and 104th.".

“A” entry “B” in the 5th 12th eth 12th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth 19,20 e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. g. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. g. e. e. e. g. e. e. e. e. g. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. 10, 2013).

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are groundless.