logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.08.21 2020가단55655
건물인도
Text

The Defendant, as the Plaintiff

(a) order the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) from August 18, 2020 to paragraph (a).

Reasons

1. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on September 30, 2019, setting a lease deposit of KRW 40 million with respect to real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant lease object”), from September 30, 2019 to September 29, 380,000 won per annum (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”), and delivered the instant lease object to the Defendant around that time. The Defendant did not completely pay the Plaintiff the amount of rent while occupying and using the leased object, and the Plaintiff received a 200,000 won agreement with the Defendant on September 30, 201 to March 20, 202, on the ground that the Plaintiff received a 2000,000 won of the instant lease agreement from September 30, 201 to September 29, 2018, and the Plaintiff received a 200,000 won of the instant lease agreement from March 28, respectively.

2. As to this, the Defendant, due to the Plaintiff’s circumstances, failed to use and take profits from the leased object for two months after the delivery of the leased object of this case, and thus, the Defendant’s business loss suffered by the Defendant was enormous, and the remainder of the lease deposit remains even after deducting the overdue vehicle. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim is unlawful.

The defendant suffered a business loss caused by the plaintiff.

arrow