1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company aimed at managing buildings, including management services, supply of services, agency services, and security service business. The instant management body is a management body established with all sectional owners as its members, based on the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “the Act”) with respect to the aggregate building of the second underground floor and the fifth floor above ground level constructed on the nine and nine lots outside the Yongsan-si flood Zone B, and the management body of this case is a management body established with respect to the aggregate building of the fifth and upper floors above ground level.

B. On October 1, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into an entrustment contract for the management of the instant commercial building between the tenant and the instant sectional owner, including the instant sectional owner, and performed the business of managing and managing the commercial building, collecting user fees, etc., and the said entrustment contract for the management of the commercial building terminated on September 30, 201.

C. The details of the change in ownership and the payment of management expenses under Article 101 of the Commercial Building Expenses 101 1) The expenses for the commercial building of this case, which acquired ownership on March 22, 2006 by D, and acquired on January 4, 2010, shall be the agricultural industry for the agricultural company (hereinafter “Korea Agriculture Industry”).

(2) D) was closed on May 2008 and did not run the business until January 4, 2010 after the transfer of ownership to the Defendant on June 19, 2012.

3) With respect to No. 101, D did not pay the aggregate of KRW 203,829,971 and late 10,191,49 of management expenses and late 214,021,470 as management expenses from January 1, 2007 to November 2009, which entered the detailed details of monthly management expenses of No. 101 for the instant shopping district, as to No. 101. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, the management body of the instant case, and the Korea Agriculture and Forestry Corporation, claiming management expenses against the Korea Agriculture and Forestry. The management body of the instant case filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff seeking management expenses, etc., and the Suwon District Court of November 16, 2012 claimed the management expenses, etc.